Connect with us

News

Abdulmumuni Vows No Forgiveness as Abiola’s Children Battle Over £650,000

Published

on

Photo source: Google

Abdulmumuni Abiola, one of the sons of the late Chief MKO Abiola, has declared that he will never forgive his elder brother, Kola Abiola, due to ongoing tensions over their father’s inheritance.

Abdulmumuni claims that Kola has deliberately withheld funds that were willed to their father’s children, despite all necessary procedures, including blood tests, being completed to confirm their legitimacy.

In an interview on the ‘Mic On Podcast’ hosted by Seun Okinbaloye, Abdulmumuni detailed the family dispute, alleging that Kola has refused to distribute £650,000 which their late father, MKO Abiola, had willed to his first four wives.

Abdulmumuni explained that Kola has continuously denied releasing the money to the beneficiaries, which has caused division within the family.

He shared background information, stating that the inheritance was meticulously outlined in the will, with specific amounts assigned to each wife.

Advertisement

Abdulmumuni’s mother, Kudirat Olayinka Abiola, who was MKO’s second wife, was to receive £150,000.

However, Kola has reportedly refused to hand over the money, citing legal technicalities under British law as the reason.

Abdulmumuni recounted that Kola had argued their mother, Kudirat, passed away before their father, and under British law, this supposedly meant the money could not be released.

Kola also claimed that he didn’t receive the £300,000 intended for his own mother, who had also passed away.

Abdulmumuni expressed disbelief, pointing out that Kola, being in control of the estate, could have chosen to release the funds if he truly wanted to.

Advertisement

Adding to the grievance, Abdulmumuni revealed that Kola had sold their mother’s apartment in the UK without informing him or his siblings.

He described this as part of a deliberate effort to impoverish their side of the family, leading him to feel deeply betrayed.

The family dispute has clearly taken a toll on Abdulmumuni, who voiced his frustration, stating that due to Kola’s actions, he cannot bring himself to forgive his elder brother.

The inheritance, which was meant to provide for the family, has instead caused a deep rift, leaving unresolved tensions between the siblings.


Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Trump Says Anyone Caught Sabotaging Tesla Cars Could Face Up to 20 Years in Prison

Published

on

Photo source: Google

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that anyone caught sabotaging Tesla cars could face up to 20 years in prison.

Trump made this statement on Friday through a post on his Truth Social account. He said, “People that get caught sabotaging Tesla’s will stand a very good chance of going to jail for up to twenty years, and that includes the funders. We are looking for you!”

This comes shortly after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that three people have been charged with setting Tesla properties on fire using Molotov cocktails. Bondi described the attacks as “domestic terrorism” and vowed that those responsible would face the full weight of the law.

Earlier this week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk had also blamed “terrorism” after multiple cars caught fire at a Tesla facility in Las Vegas.


 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Everything You Need to Know About Tinubu’s State of Emergency in Rivers State

Published

on

Photo source: Google

In March 2025, Nigeria’s political landscape was jolted by President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, a pivotal region in the nation’s oil production. This unprecedented move, the first in over a decade, has been met with a spectrum of reactions, reflecting the complexity of the situation.

Genesis of the Crisis

The turmoil in Rivers State has been brewing for months, primarily due to a power tussle between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and factions within the opposition People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

Also, the discord escalated when state lawmakers initiated impeachment proceedings against Governor Fubara, accusing him of illegal budget presentations and issues related to the legislative chamber’s composition. This internal strife significantly hampered governance and stability in the state.

Compounding the political unrest, Rivers State experienced a surge in pipeline vandalism. Notably, a recent explosion on the Trans Niger Pipeline resulted in a fire outbreak, disrupting a major oil transportation route.

Furthermore, President Tinubu expressed concern over these incidents, mentioning the lack of effective action by the state government to address the sabotage, which poses threats to both the economy and environmental safety.

Advertisement

Presidential Intervention

In response to the escalating crisis, President Tinubu invoked Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State on March 18, 2025. This action led to the suspension of Governor Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for an initial period of six months.

Additionally, retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas was appointed as the military administrator to oversee the state’s affairs during this period, with the judiciary remaining functional to ensure the rule of law.

Legislative Approval

Following the declaration, both chambers of the National Assembly—the Senate and the House of Representatives—endorsed the state of emergency.

Despite initial resistance from some opposition parliamentarians, the lawmakers acknowledged the necessity of the measures to address the pressing issues in Rivers State. The emergency rule is set to last for six months, during which the federal government will implement strategies to stabilize the region.

Diverse Reactions

The declaration has elicited a wide array of responses:

Advertisement
  • Legal Community:

The Nigerian Bar Association criticized the suspension of elected officials as illegal, arguing that a declaration of emergency does not automatically dissolve or suspend elected state governments.

  • Regional Organizations:

The Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) rejected the declaration, describing it as hasty and unjustifiable. They argued that the move was unnecessary and failed to address the real issues causing the political crisis in the state.

  • Political Analysts:

Also, figures like Dr. Reuben Abati, former media aide to President Goodluck Jonathan, labeled the declaration as an “impeachable offence,” asserting that the president lacks constitutional authority to remove a state governor through such a proclamation.

Rivers State, located in the Niger Delta, is vital for Nigeria’s crude oil production. The region has faced issues of pipeline sabotage that disrupt production and exports.


 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Ryan Reynolds Fights $400M Defamation Lawsuit From Justin Baldoni

Published

on

Photo source: Google

In a high-profile legal battle, actor Ryan Reynolds is seeking dismissal from a $400 million defamation lawsuit filed by fellow actor and director Justin Baldoni. The dispute originates from allegations by Reynolds’ wife, actress Blake Lively, who accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during the production of the film “It Ends With Us.”

The controversy began in December 2024 when Lively filed a civil rights complaint against Baldoni, alleging repeated sexual harassment and inappropriate behaviour on set.

She claimed that after raising these concerns, Baldoni and his associates initiated a campaign to tarnish her reputation.

In response, Baldoni filed a counter-lawsuit in January 2025, accusing Lively and Reynolds of defamation, civil extortion, and invasion of privacy.

He alleged that the couple attempted to “hijack” the film and destroy his career. Baldoni’s lawsuit also named Lively’s publicist, Leslie Sloane, and her firm, Vision PR Inc., as defendants.

Advertisement

Also, Reynolds’ legal team recently filed a motion to dismiss the defamation claims against him. They argue that referring to Baldoni as a “predator” constitutes a protected opinion under the First Amendment.

The motion asserts that there is no evidence suggesting Reynolds did not believe his statement to be true, and therefore, it does not meet the criteria for defamation.

Furthermore, Reynolds’ attorneys contend that Baldoni’s allegations about a character named “Nicepool” in Reynolds’ “Deadpool & Wolverine” film, purportedly mocking Baldoni, do not amount to legal harm but rather “hurt feelings.” They emphasize that Reynolds’ involvement in the matter stems solely from his role as a supportive spouse to Lively.

Baldoni’s legal team disputes Reynolds’ motion, asserting that Reynolds was actively involved in a smear campaign against Baldoni.

Additionally, Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s attorney, criticized Reynolds for attempting to “run from the flames” by seeking dismissal from the lawsuit. Freedman maintains that the claims against Reynolds are serious and that he must be held accountable for his actions.


 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending