Connect with us

News

JAMB Allows Candidates Turning 16 by August 31, 2025, to Be Admitted for 2024/2025 Session

Published

on

Photo source: Google

The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has announced that Nigerian universities and other tertiary institutions are now permitted to admit candidates who will turn 16 by August 31, 2025, into the 2024/2025 academic session.

This decision comes as part of the board’s commitment to ensuring that admission processes remain fair and inclusive for all eligible candidates.

According to the latest directive, candidates who meet the academic and institutional requirements but are not yet 16 years old by December 31, 2024, can now be considered for admission as long as they reach the age of 16 by the end of August 2025.

This decision follows extensive discussions held earlier this year during JAMB’s 2024 Policy Meeting, where it was established that the minimum age for admission to tertiary institutions in Nigeria would be set at 16 years.

Initially, the board set the age cut-off date for December 31, 2024, sparking a wave of reactions from parents, educational stakeholders, and the general public.

Advertisement

Some parents expressed concerns that their children, who would have otherwise qualified for admission based on their academic performance, might be excluded due to the age restriction.

Many parents argued that the age requirement could disadvantage young, high-achieving students who completed their secondary education early.

In response to these concerns, JAMB’s spokesperson, Fabian Benjamin, released a statement clarifying the board’s position.

He explained that several institutions had extended their admission periods into the middle of 2025, some as late as July, creating a window for candidates who would turn 16 shortly after the original cut-off date.

To accommodate these candidates, the board has now set a new cut-off age deadline of August 31, 2025.

Advertisement

This move, according to JAMB, is intended to maintain equity in the admission process, ensuring that students who turn 16 during the extended admission period are not unfairly left out.

Benjamin emphasized that the new policy is not mandatory for all institutions.

Any university or tertiary institution that wishes to maintain its internal policy of requiring candidates to be 16 years old by the end of 2024 is free to do so.

This flexibility allows institutions to adopt the admission timeline that best suits their academic calendar while still adhering to the general age requirement set by JAMB.

The decision has sparked diverse opinions. Some parents welcomed the adjustment, appreciating the board’s effort to provide more opportunities for students who may have been excluded due to age constraints.

Advertisement

They believe that this new policy will allow young, bright students to continue their academic journey without unnecessary delays.

On the other hand, some critics argue that the minimum age requirement is still a necessary safeguard, ensuring that students are mature enough to handle the demands of tertiary education.

Education experts have weighed in on the matter, highlighting the importance of balancing academic readiness with emotional and social maturity.

They point out that while many students may excel academically at a young age, the transition to tertiary education often requires a certain level of maturity, especially in navigating the independence and responsibilities that come with higher learning.

JAMB’s policy shift is part of a broader effort to streamline the admission process in Nigerian tertiary institutions.

Advertisement

Over the years, the board has introduced several reforms aimed at improving transparency, fairness, and efficiency in the admission process.

These reforms include the introduction of the Central Admissions Processing System (CAPS), which allows institutions to manage their admissions more effectively while allowing candidates to monitor their admission status online.

As institutions prepare for the 2024/2025 academic session, the new age policy is expected to provide greater flexibility for both candidates and schools.

It will enable more students to access higher education opportunities while allowing universities and colleges to make informed decisions based on their timelines.

In the coming months, JAMB and tertiary institutions across the country will continue to engage with stakeholders, including parents, educators, and policymakers, to ensure that the admission process remains fair, transparent, and inclusive for all Nigerian students.

Advertisement

With this new policy in place, the board aims to address concerns raised by various quarters while keeping its focus on delivering a smooth and efficient admission process for the upcoming academic year.


 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Trump Says Anyone Caught Sabotaging Tesla Cars Could Face Up to 20 Years in Prison

Published

on

Photo source: Google

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that anyone caught sabotaging Tesla cars could face up to 20 years in prison.

Trump made this statement on Friday through a post on his Truth Social account. He said, “People that get caught sabotaging Tesla’s will stand a very good chance of going to jail for up to twenty years, and that includes the funders. We are looking for you!”

This comes shortly after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that three people have been charged with setting Tesla properties on fire using Molotov cocktails. Bondi described the attacks as “domestic terrorism” and vowed that those responsible would face the full weight of the law.

Earlier this week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk had also blamed “terrorism” after multiple cars caught fire at a Tesla facility in Las Vegas.


 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Everything You Need to Know About Tinubu’s State of Emergency in Rivers State

Published

on

Photo source: Google

In March 2025, Nigeria’s political landscape was jolted by President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, a pivotal region in the nation’s oil production. This unprecedented move, the first in over a decade, has been met with a spectrum of reactions, reflecting the complexity of the situation.

Genesis of the Crisis

The turmoil in Rivers State has been brewing for months, primarily due to a power tussle between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and factions within the opposition People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

Also, the discord escalated when state lawmakers initiated impeachment proceedings against Governor Fubara, accusing him of illegal budget presentations and issues related to the legislative chamber’s composition. This internal strife significantly hampered governance and stability in the state.

Compounding the political unrest, Rivers State experienced a surge in pipeline vandalism. Notably, a recent explosion on the Trans Niger Pipeline resulted in a fire outbreak, disrupting a major oil transportation route.

Furthermore, President Tinubu expressed concern over these incidents, mentioning the lack of effective action by the state government to address the sabotage, which poses threats to both the economy and environmental safety.

Advertisement

Presidential Intervention

In response to the escalating crisis, President Tinubu invoked Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State on March 18, 2025. This action led to the suspension of Governor Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for an initial period of six months.

Additionally, retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas was appointed as the military administrator to oversee the state’s affairs during this period, with the judiciary remaining functional to ensure the rule of law.

Legislative Approval

Following the declaration, both chambers of the National Assembly—the Senate and the House of Representatives—endorsed the state of emergency.

Despite initial resistance from some opposition parliamentarians, the lawmakers acknowledged the necessity of the measures to address the pressing issues in Rivers State. The emergency rule is set to last for six months, during which the federal government will implement strategies to stabilize the region.

Diverse Reactions

The declaration has elicited a wide array of responses:

Advertisement
  • Legal Community:

The Nigerian Bar Association criticized the suspension of elected officials as illegal, arguing that a declaration of emergency does not automatically dissolve or suspend elected state governments.

  • Regional Organizations:

The Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) rejected the declaration, describing it as hasty and unjustifiable. They argued that the move was unnecessary and failed to address the real issues causing the political crisis in the state.

  • Political Analysts:

Also, figures like Dr. Reuben Abati, former media aide to President Goodluck Jonathan, labeled the declaration as an “impeachable offence,” asserting that the president lacks constitutional authority to remove a state governor through such a proclamation.

Rivers State, located in the Niger Delta, is vital for Nigeria’s crude oil production. The region has faced issues of pipeline sabotage that disrupt production and exports.


 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Ryan Reynolds Fights $400M Defamation Lawsuit From Justin Baldoni

Published

on

Photo source: Google

In a high-profile legal battle, actor Ryan Reynolds is seeking dismissal from a $400 million defamation lawsuit filed by fellow actor and director Justin Baldoni. The dispute originates from allegations by Reynolds’ wife, actress Blake Lively, who accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during the production of the film “It Ends With Us.”

The controversy began in December 2024 when Lively filed a civil rights complaint against Baldoni, alleging repeated sexual harassment and inappropriate behaviour on set.

She claimed that after raising these concerns, Baldoni and his associates initiated a campaign to tarnish her reputation.

In response, Baldoni filed a counter-lawsuit in January 2025, accusing Lively and Reynolds of defamation, civil extortion, and invasion of privacy.

He alleged that the couple attempted to “hijack” the film and destroy his career. Baldoni’s lawsuit also named Lively’s publicist, Leslie Sloane, and her firm, Vision PR Inc., as defendants.

Advertisement

Also, Reynolds’ legal team recently filed a motion to dismiss the defamation claims against him. They argue that referring to Baldoni as a “predator” constitutes a protected opinion under the First Amendment.

The motion asserts that there is no evidence suggesting Reynolds did not believe his statement to be true, and therefore, it does not meet the criteria for defamation.

Furthermore, Reynolds’ attorneys contend that Baldoni’s allegations about a character named “Nicepool” in Reynolds’ “Deadpool & Wolverine” film, purportedly mocking Baldoni, do not amount to legal harm but rather “hurt feelings.” They emphasize that Reynolds’ involvement in the matter stems solely from his role as a supportive spouse to Lively.

Baldoni’s legal team disputes Reynolds’ motion, asserting that Reynolds was actively involved in a smear campaign against Baldoni.

Additionally, Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s attorney, criticized Reynolds for attempting to “run from the flames” by seeking dismissal from the lawsuit. Freedman maintains that the claims against Reynolds are serious and that he must be held accountable for his actions.


 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending