News
Atiku Slams Tinubu’s Speech, Claims It Fails to Address Protesters’ Concerns

Atiku Abubakar, the 2023 presidential candidate for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has strongly criticized President Bola Tinubu’s recent address regarding the #EndBadGovernance protests in Nigeria.
In his remarks, Atiku contends that Tinubu’s speech fell short of addressing the core issues raised by the demonstrators and failed to resonate with the broader Nigerian populace.
Atiku’s critique, delivered through a statement from his media adviser Paul Ibe, underscores the perceived deficiencies in Tinubu’s address.
According to Atiku, the President’s speech lacked depth and did not offer concrete solutions to the severe economic challenges that have plagued Nigerians since Tinubu assumed office.
The PDP leader argues that Tinubu’s response failed to inspire confidence in his administration’s ability to effect meaningful reforms.
He points out that the speech was marred by its premature leakage, which, according to Atiku, reflects a broader issue of diminishing trust in the current administration.
Atiku elaborates that Tinubu’s address was intended to quell the unrest stemming from public dissatisfaction with the administration’s governance.
However, Atiku believes the speech was insufficient, particularly in addressing the pressing economic difficulties faced by Nigerian families.
He criticizes the President for not presenting substantial reforms or practical measures to alleviate the economic burden.
The former Vice President notes that the President missed key opportunities to address specific demands from the protesters.
These demands included halting the acquisition of new aircraft for the President, reducing the size of his cabinet, and reconsidering the costly office of the First Lady, which has reportedly been engaged in extravagant activities funded by the public.
Atiku describes Tinubu’s speech as superficial, suggesting that it revealed the President’s weak grasp of the policy issues at hand.
He argues that the President’s words failed to convince the public and did not reflect a genuine commitment to addressing the protesters’ grievances.
Furthermore, Atiku criticizes the administration for its failure to manage the speech’s confidentiality, as evidenced by its early leak.
This incident, he argues, is emblematic of the broader loss of confidence in the government.
In his statement, Atiku emphasizes that the current economic crisis is not the result of opposition sabotage but rather a consequence of the Tinubu administration’s ineffective policies.
He calls on the government to cease the practice of blaming past administrations and to confront the realities of their own shortcomings.
Overall, Atiku’s response highlights a significant disconnect between the administration’s messaging and the public’s expectations for substantive change and accountability.
News
Legal Group Files Lawsuit Against Trump Over Tariffs, Claims He Exceeded His Authority

A legal advocacy group filed a lawsuit on Monday challenging US President Donald Trump’s broad tariffs on foreign trade partners. The group, Liberty Justice Center, argues that Trump exceeded his authority by imposing these tariffs and has asked the US Court of International Trade to block them.
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of five small businesses, targets the tariffs Trump introduced on April 2, as well as the additional duties placed on China. These businesses include a wine and spirits importer from New York and a Virginia-based company making educational kits and musical instruments.
Liberty Justice Center senior counsel Jeffrey Schwab argued that only Congress, not the president, has the constitutional authority to set tax rates, including tariffs. He stated, “No one person should have the power to impose taxes with such far-reaching global consequences.”
In response, White House spokesman Harrison Fields defended Trump’s tariffs, saying they were necessary to address unfair trade practices, particularly with China. He claimed the president is standing up for American businesses and workers by correcting trade imbalances.
This lawsuit follows another similar legal challenge in Florida, where a small business owner is also seeking to block tariffs on Chinese goods.
Trump’s tariffs include a 10% duty on goods from all countries, with higher rates for those with significant barriers to US imports. While some of the tariffs were paused for 90 days, the Liberty Justice Center argues that Trump’s use of special executive powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act doesn’t authorize such actions.
Entertainment
Portable Sent to Prison in Ilorin After Failing to Meet Bail in Saheed Osupa Case

Controversial singer Portable, whose real name is Okikiola Badmus, has been sent to the Oke Kura Correctional Centre in Ilorin, Kwara State.
This followed his failure to meet the strict bail conditions set by an Upper Area Court, where he appeared on Monday over a defamation case filed by Fuji music legend Saheed Osupa.
The court granted him bail at N1 million with tough conditions. He is required to provide two sureties—one must be either the Chairman or Secretary of the Performing Musicians Association of Nigeria (PMAN), while the other must own a property within a Government Reserved Area in Ilorin and present a valid Certificate of Occupancy.
Until those conditions are met, Portable will remain in custody.
News
Yoon Suk Yeol’s Trial Begins Over Martial Law And Causing Political Chaos

The criminal trial of South Korea’s former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, began on Monday as he faces charges of insurrection for declaring martial law late last year, which led to months of political unrest.
The martial law declaration lasted just six hours after parliamentary staffers blocked special forces from entering the parliament building, where lawmakers voted against it.
Yoon, who left his home in a motorcade to attend the court session at the Seoul Central District Court, denied all charges. Prosecutors argued that he had no legal right to declare martial law and accused him of attempting to paralyze state institutions like parliament.
Yoon defended his actions, claiming that martial law was necessary to highlight the opposition party’s control over the legislature, which repeatedly blocked his government’s agenda. He maintained that he never intended to disrupt the country.
The charge of insurrection could result in life imprisonment or even the death penalty, though South Korea has not carried out executions in decades.
Earlier this month, Yoon was removed from office by the Constitutional Court for violating constitutional powers, with his martial law declaration on December 3 which is a serious blow to democracy. The court notes that his actions caused chaos across society, the economy, and foreign policy.
-
Sport18 hours ago
Julio Baptista Says Cristiano Ronaldo is the Greatest of All Time, Ahead of Messi
-
Sport18 hours ago
Joe Cole Says PSG Can Win the Champions League This Season
-
Politics13 hours ago
Atiku’s Coalition Says PDP Governors Are Secretly Helping Tinubu Win Again in 2027
-
Sport18 hours ago
Ronaldo Set to Sign Al Nassr Contract That Will Keep Him at the Club Till 2026
-
Sport13 hours ago
Rooney Tells Rashford to Play for Man U the Same Way He Played for Aston Villa Against PSG
-
Entertainment18 hours ago
“No Need for Jealousy When We Can All Succeed” – Eniola Badmus Speaks After Clash with Laide Bakare
-
Politics11 hours ago
“PDP Are Quietly Supporting APC Instead of Fighting for Democracy” – Coalition Says
-
Entertainment15 hours ago
Cardi B Fires Back at Offset’s Cheating Accusation: ‘Leave Me the F*ck Alone!’”