Connect with us

Entertainment

Court Rejects Bobrisky’s N1.2 Billion Claim Over Rights Violation Against EFCC

Published

on

Photo source: Google

A Federal High Court in Lagos State has dismissed a fundamental rights suit filed by popular crossdresser, Okuneye Idris Olanrewaju, widely known as Bobrisky, against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

The suit also included a demand against the National Assembly, alleging a violation of his rights.

Bobrisky had approached the court seeking N200 million as compensation for psychological trauma he claimed to have suffered due to the actions of the EFCC.

Additionally, he demanded a staggering N1 billion from the National Assembly, accusing both entities of violating his right to a fair hearing.

The crossdresser further sought an order restraining the EFCC and the National Assembly from harassing, detaining, or issuing a wanted notice against him.

Advertisement

The legal battle stems from an audio recording that was allegedly leaked by Martins Otse, a social media influencer, claiming that Bobrisky had paid N15 million to the EFCC in exchange for dropping money laundering charges.

Delivering the judgment, Justice Alexander Owoeye stated that Bobrisky’s claims of rights violations were unsubstantiated and not backed by credible evidence.

The judge emphasized that the evidence presented by the crossdresser failed to meet the necessary legal threshold to support his case.

In the court’s ruling, Justice Owoeye remarked, “After thoroughly evaluating the evidence brought before this court, it is clear that the applicant has not provided sufficient proof to justify the declaratory and injunctive reliefs being sought.

The claims of rights violations against the first and second respondents are unfounded and have no merit. Therefore, they are dismissed.”

Advertisement

The EFCC, represented by its spokesperson Dele Oyewale, welcomed the judgment, stating that it reaffirmed the agency’s stance on the matter.

The commission maintained that its actions were within the bounds of the law and aimed at upholding accountability in financial matters.

Justice Owoeye also declined to award damages against the EFCC, rejecting Bobrisky’s request for monetary compensation.


 

Advertisement

Entertainment

Veekee James Celebrates 31st Birthday With Heartfelt Motherhood Message

Published

on


Nigerian fashion designer Veekee James celebrated her 31st birthday and shared pictures on social media with her daughter.

The influencer spoke about how her life has changed and described motherhood as the greatest gift she has received.

“A year older, but the greatest gift isn’t the age… It’s the title I earned this year: MOTHER! This birthday hits differently because my heart now beats outside my body.”

“Before this year, birthdays were about me. Now, they’re a reminder of the little soul who made me a mom and changed my life forever.”


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Bovi Explains Why He Doesn’t See Every Divorce as a Failure

Published

on


Nigerian actor Bovi has spoken about marriage and divorce, sharing his thoughts on the subject.

The actor revealed during a recent interview that not all divorces should be seen as failures.

He explained that sometimes a marriage gets to a point where one or both partners can no longer breathe comfortably in the relationship, which could eventually lead to divorce.

“I celebrate when people get divorced because I feel it means one or both people were not breathing well in the marriage.”


Continue Reading

Entertainment

Tioruju Mondusi Opens Up on Most Painful Experience of His Life

Published

on


Nigerian actor Tioruju Mondusi has shared one of the most painful experiences of his life.

During a recent interview, the actor revealed that his wife gave him the most painful news he had ever received.

“The only person that did the most painful thing to me in life is my wife. The incident brought tears to my eyes. She’s late now, may God forgive her.”

The actor revealed that his wife told him that the pregnancy she was carrying was not his and that the child belonged to another man.


Continue Reading

Trending